top of page

Where Don’t You Need an IOR?

2 days ago
2 min read

Most shippers assume that every shipment crossing into another country needs a formal Importer of Record. That’s no longer a safe assumption, but it’s also not yet false. The exceptions are real. They’re just shrinking fast. 


What an Importer of Record Actually Does 

An Importer of Record (IOR) is the party legally responsible for the customs entry: supplying correct registration details, valuing the goods accurately, and paying whatever duties and taxes fall due. Whenever a shipment is commercial in nature, that party must be a registered business: one with a tax or business number and, where required, an importer’s code. The consignee can still be an individual; however, the IOR cannot. Strip away the paperwork and the rule is simple: customs only needs a named, legally responsible declarant when someone has to be liable for duties and taxes at the border.


Where nobody owes anything at the border, there is no IOR requirement to satisfy. There are two situations where that condition never arises. 


  1. Low-Value and De Minimis Shipments 


Shipments under a country’s de minimis threshold have historically skipped the IOR requirement entirely, meaning no named declarant is needed, because no duty is owed. But that principle is coming to an end almost everywhere at once: 

United States: the $800 de minimis exemption was suspended almost entirely from August 2025. 

European Union: the €150 exemption ended on 1 July 2026, replaced by a flat €3 duty per declaration line while full tariffs phase in through 2028. 

United Kingdom: the £135 exemption is now set to be phased out by October 2028, brought forward from the original March 2029 deadline. 


As these thresholds fall away, more and more shipments that once cleared duty-free now need a properly named IOR. 


  1. Indirect Representation 


The other route around a named IOR is indirect representation: a customs broker declares the goods in their own name, on your behalf, instead of you being named as the Importer of Record. It’s a genuine workaround, provided the destination country allows it. Indirect representation is not allowed everywhere. Germany, China, India, Mexico, Brazil, Singapore, Spain, and Italy all prohibit indirect representation on import. In each of these markets, you’re pushed into one of two positions: register as the named Importer of Record yourself through direct representation, or appoint a Fiscal Representative to act as the declarant on your behalf. Japan is the standout exception. Indirect representation is permitted there with no Fiscal Representative required, making it a rare case where the workaround still holds up cleanly. 

 

The Bottom Line 


An Importer of Record isn’t universally required; however, both paths around it, de minimis relief and indirect representation, are narrowing. Low-value thresholds are being dismantled market by market, and the list of countries barring indirect representation keeps growing. Shippers relying on either exception today should treat it as temporary, not permanent.


If you wish to learn more, get in touch with our international trade team at international@gmchamber.co.uk.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
VOL. II The Curse of the EUR 1

They thought the shipment was ready…..they thought the paperwork was complete…but something had been overlooked… Preferential origin It was a cold October night at the warehouse. The final shipment of

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page